Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Saturday, August 1, 2009
I am spending a week at a cottage on Lake Michigan with my pinochle group. A few of these friends also play bridge, so in the midst of hands of pinochle I am finding the opportunity to also play hands of bridge.
We are taking this opportunity to study our books and notes, discuss our bids, and replay hands hoping for better results. While we are engrossed in these endeavors, the non-bridge players look at us askance. You’re on vacation, they say. Why are you working so hard? That doesn’t look like fun to me.
We smile and shrug. We try to tell them how the game of bridge draws you in, how each hand presents its own challenges in terms of bidding and playing. We tell them that it is the mental work involved with each new and different hand that makes the game so interesting and so addictive.
I think we may have a couple of new recruits.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Yesterday I played bridge for 7 hours. I went from being a Newcomer who made some horrendous mistakes to being the expert who answered all questions. It was an extremely disorienting experience.
I started the day—well, the late morning—at the local duplicate bridge club. I met my partner there about ½ hour before the starting time, and we went over the systems card. Since we are both Newcomers, we didn’t know what half of it meant. However, the process did help us review what we did know (some of which we promptly forgot the minute we started playing). As we prepared to venture into the world of experienced players, my partner commented that this was how it must feel to run with the bulls in Pamploma.
Everyone was very kind to us, although one pair did get irritated when I bid incorrectly. We ended up in the right contract, but apparently our opponents played according to what they thought I had, not the cards I actually did have. My partner had bid 1 NT, and I attempted a transfer. It turns out I should have simply bid 2NT. Transfers and “garbage” Stayman are new to me I became horribly confused. I have studied 1 NT responses extensively, so this mistake shook my already shaky confidence and it took me a few hands to settle down.
When it was all over, we had a score of 84.50 with a percentage of 39.12. My ever-positive partner noted that we were not last, and in fact had played above average on 7 of the 27 boards. We even had one 8, which was top of the board!
A few hours after this exhilarating and humbling experience, I went to a friend’s house for more bridge. We had two tables of players with varying expertise and we played relay style, changing partners after every couple of hands. Oddly enough, I was the expert of the group! This change in status was disconcerting but enjoyable. I was able to answer more than one question regarding NT responses, so hopefully that information is now solidly in my head and I will bid that correctly next time!